I also wanted to bring some things up that I could never properly intergrate into an argument.
1st Thing, 2 words:
Ken.
Penders.
This is a man that is so hated by the Archie community, and kind of in general by Sonic fans, for suing Archie and actually winning. He claimed copyright over his characters because of Sonic Chronicles, and Archie had to go through a "Super Genesis Wave" that redesigned the entire world of Mobius and it's denizens. Arguably, Archie started to die off with it's issues, and many blame Penders to this day. There's a 2ish hour-long interview talking with Penders himself on YT about his struggles with Archie and the trial as a whole, and genuinely? I feel bad for the guy. The rushed work conditions he was under and illegal use of his characters in a game, it seemed things were stacked against him. So he took what he wrote back with a lawsuit, and won.
From what I see from comments on YT relating to Archie, people despise Penders for doing his actions and basically causing Archie to fail and IDW take over. But the scariest part for me? If this man and the situation that happened with him happened within this community, people would have been on his side.
People would have been defending Penders and maybe even praise him for taking back his characters as "he didn't give the permission for it". The parallel between Ken Pender's story of plagiarism and this community's "status quo"(Sandwichface) of protecting Reusability is insane in my eyes. This man, in short, took what was his back, and in this hypothetical case, ban the Archie stand-in from the community for taking his stuff without permission.
And yet. Fans. Hate. Him. For it.
Just interesting thing to point out and maybe discuss.
2nd Thing, 2 more words:
Public. Domain.
With companies like Disney, people often long for the days when a certain franchise or IP could have some fresh new stories for people to experience, but they can't because any attempt to do so would have Disney or the IP holder come down on them hard. And I sometimes see people whine that "_______ isn't doing anything with ______ and I hate it" or "I wish I owned _____ instead of _____ so I could revive the franchise".
Do y'all remember January 1st, or just the internet in January? Everyone freaked out when Mickey Mouse himself became public domain. Everyone started doing whatever with him, doing stuff Disney would normally eradicate, but can't since they don't own him anymore.
And the mockery was insane.
The mockery to Disney that something they strived so long to keep and not let the public access, finally be let loose onto us was so high. I think some of it still goes on today with people jesting Disney with "now I own mickey hehe".
This is a little random for a thread about portlegs and reusability, but this is the part I really wanna highlight:
People hate those who own something and won't share it with everyone else.
You can criticize this all you want, but it's more just statements rather than attacks. Analyze this and counter all you want, but you're not winning anything. You're just fulfilling some need to be right here.
Anyways, have fun reading 20 paragraphs :)