MasterServer Ban list (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hyperknux said:
IP: 92.112.151.206
Port: 60297
Name: [HETOR] Funny Coop
Version: 1.09.4
Reason: Wasting Bandwith on the master server. He has 3 dedicated servers running this minute. And a picture & blog to prove it.


Log: http://www.nomorepasting.com/getpaste.php?pasteid=16623

The other 2 IP's for his dedicated servers are.

IP: 92.112.151.206 Port: 61311 Name: [HETOR] SS42 Match
IP: 92.112.151.206 Port: 60924 Name: [HETOR] HWH09 TEST 1

These IP addresses are on this minute. I don't need 3 blogs as the log above says it all, and also the picture. If you do want it, I'll try and get them if I can.
Click to expand...


I can add to this:
Reason: Unsuitable content (pole dancers again)
http://srb2.pastebin.com/m463ce74b
Note the no-censor patch being added.

http://cueball61.sepwich.com/stuff/screen/srb20031.png


I think this constitutes for a permanent ban, considering he's broken the same rule again and again and is perfectly aware that he's breaking since he was banned for it, not to mention the waste of bandwidth...

By the way, I think you got the wrong picture... :P
 
No, that picture was proof of bandwith wastage from the coop dedicated server Cue which also adds to my evidence :P
 
Cue said:
Hyperknux said:
IP: 92.112.151.206
Port: 60297
Name: [HETOR] Funny Coop
Version: 1.09.4
Reason: Wasting Bandwith on the master server. He has 3 dedicated servers running this minute. And a picture & blog to prove it.


Log: http://www.nomorepasting.com/getpaste.php?pasteid=16623

The other 2 IP's for his dedicated servers are.

IP: 92.112.151.206 Port: 61311 Name: [HETOR] SS42 Match
IP: 92.112.151.206 Port: 60924 Name: [HETOR] HWH09 TEST 1

These IP addresses are on this minute. I don't need 3 blogs as the log above says it all, and also the picture. If you do want it, I'll try and get them if I can.
Click to expand...


I can add to this:
Reason: Unsuitable content (pole dancers again)
http://srb2.pastebin.com/m463ce74b
Note the no-censor patch being added.

http://cueball61.sepwich.com/stuff/screen/srb20031.png


I think this constitutes for a permanent ban, considering he's broken the same rule again and again and is perfectly aware that he's breaking since he was banned for it, not to mention the waste of bandwidth...

By the way, I think you got the wrong picture... :P
Click to expand...
theres more than poledancers i belive there is another thing too
 
Hyperknux said:
IP: 92.112.151.206
Port: 60297
Name: [HETOR] Funny Coop
Version: 1.09.4
Reason: Wasting Bandwith on the master server. He has 3 dedicated servers running this minute. And a picture & blog to prove it.


Log: http://www.nomorepasting.com/getpaste.php?pasteid=16623
Click to expand...

Deja vu
Hetor said:
http://wiki.srb2.org/wiki/Dedicated_server
Click to expand...

Hetor said:
It's NOT hangout!!! Level can't be finished if NO ONE joined to the server!!!
Click to expand...

About the IPs - it's same! Maybe you mean different port, so, if you don't know, multiple (joinable) servers cannot be hosted on 1 single port.

About No Censor Patch on HWH server - ok, I'll stop hosting it.
 
If they were on different IP Addresses or on a connection capable of handling 3 servers (100mbit+) then it'd be acceptable, but they're not, they are on the same IP and they all lag horribly, a complete waste of Logan's bandwidth.
 
Cue, my servers is laggy for you because you got big ping to me. People from Europe have less lag and from ukraine haven't lag at all. You'll still have that lag if I host only 1 server.
 
I asked many people from Europe and they says they haven't any lag. Maybe it something with YOUR connection, Cue?
 
Hetor said:
I asked many people from Europe and they says they haven't any lag. Maybe it something with YOUR connection, Cue?
Click to expand...

Or maybe it's because he lives in England, like me. There's a big difference between Britain and, say... Romania. But they're both in (Or around about) Europe.
 
I have a 10mbit connection, and yes, it is always at 10mbit. Either way, you have broken a rule and deserve a ban, not to mention hosting 3 servers is utterly pointless.

If you have any problem with this, Logan doesn't care. The master server is not a democracy, it is a dictatorship, and Logan is the head dick.
- Draykon Vokelda on The SRB2 Master Server
 
SHOW ME THAT FUCKING RULE WHICH I BREAKING!!! MULTIPLE SERVERS DOESN'T BREAK ANY RULE! IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY SERVERS JUST DON'T COME! WHY I MUST GET BAN JUST BECAUSE YOU GOT LAG ON MY SERVER?!
 
Maybe you should:
A) Bother reading what he's saying
B) Consider that lag is not the reason that a ban is being requested
C) Consider that they have other valid points
D) Don't type in all caps.

Seriously, that post just made you look like a moron. I suggest you brush up on your netiquette.
 
Yeah, stop fighting you two. It was my map from match-zone-vk1 -MAP18. It's too big and too laggy even for me when I host it and noone joins.

I mean that map is laggy even for a single player. Not because of dedicated servers.
 
Sasa said:
Yeah, stop fighting you two. It was my map from match-zone-vk1 -MAP18. It's too big and too laggy even for me when I host it and noone joins.

I mean that map is laggy even for a single player. Not because of dedicated servers.
Click to expand...

He mean network lag. He always says it to me.
 
1.) Non-censored patch yesterday. - Reported, will be getting a ban very soon.

2.) You may not be breaking a rule, but you're wasting Logan's bandwidth, he has enough heartbeats coming through without you sending 3 times as many as you should be.

3.) You're not helping yourself by using caps-lock, like I said, Logan is the head dick, you annoy him and you'll only make it longer.
 
<STRIKE>the Masterserver only lists one server per IP address, any other servers running at the same IP address without being manually entered via masterclient as a permanent server will not show up, and will overwrite the old one. it would be a waste of bandwidth on the heartbeats, now if you had only one of them set to be listed, and the others unlisted, that would be fine.</STRIKE> Oh yea, that was fixed sometime ago...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who is viewing this thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Back
Top