TimberWolf
Official ***** Troll
Because I was correcting someone.BlueZero4 said:But see, Elise isn't in Shadow, Riders, or etc., yet you specifically mentioned her in a post above.
Because I was correcting someone.BlueZero4 said:But see, Elise isn't in Shadow, Riders, or etc., yet you specifically mentioned her in a post above.
TimberWolf said:And do you REALLY think that Sonic would've survived as rainbows and 2D? If so, you need to learn more about games.
Shuffle said:I'm 17, I'd like Sonic to not be realistic and serious. :/
TimberWolf said:Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand if they stayed as a kids game, you'd be saying the exact opposite.Shuffle said:I'm 17, I'd like Sonic to not be realistic and serious. :/
TimberWolf said:I still think it's better that it's getting mroe serious. It started with SA1, really, when Chaos flooded Station Square. It's obvious that hundreds of men, women adn children drowned.
TimberWolf said:And then SA2 shows the ARK incident, Prison Island exploding and Shadow's "death".
Shadow was just carrying on the seriousness, and it's cool to have characters die sometimes. As well, SEGA and ST knew that Shadow wasn't a SONIC game but a SHADOW game, adn they knew that people considered Shadow bad-ass in SA2, so they researched bad-ass video game characters and what did they find? That bad-ass video game characters nowadays USE GUNS AND VEHICLES.
TimberWolf said:As well, Shadow got a huuuuuuuuuge fanbase after SA2 that wanted Shadow back, and they didn't kill Shadow in the first place. Hence, Shadow's return. Along with a new plot point.
TimberWolf said:SEGA listens to their Sonic fans.
tails92 said:As Shuffle said, all SEGA is doing is destroying Sonic.
They somewhat want Sonic to become more `adult`, demonstrated by the fact that they have made Sonic `taller` in Sonic 2k6. BS, I say.
Sonic was never meant to be adult or serious.
A game isn't fun because it is `adult` it's fun because it's fun.
We don't need adult-ish in Sonic. We really don't.
Who needs that Princess Elise? She's just useless, I bet they just included her for 'perv'-factor. They're trying to get more audience, and they fail miserably.
Maybe SEGA wants Sonic to go somewhat the way Conker went at the end?
It's unlikely to happen, but seeing what they are doing lately, it's a possibility.
I also bet that one of the reasons why Naka left was because Sonic Team wasn't capable of doing anything right anymore, look at what they have done with Sonic 1 while porting it to the GBA.
Voted the first option, anyway.
This much tells me you've been reading Archie's stories lately. Tell me; is it as morbidly generic and terrible than it was almost one hundred issues ago?Ashovare said:Mobius Prime
What? All of those points valid. Would you REALLY want to play a game that's so god damn glitchy that you CAN'T play it? I'd say the pointless weapons is also a valid point, why are you trying to throw out any point one can make before he even makes it?TimberWolf said:[
Exlain how they ruined it. And saying that it's because it's a Shadow game, because of the weapons and vehicles, because of the aliens or because it has "glitches", "bad camera angles" and "cheap deaths", you point is void.
QFT. It sounds like you don't care what the game plays like, as long as it is Sonic.Maou-Shin Daioka said:Sounds like you're a fanboy that's in denial of the blunders of Sonic thus far.
If you're going to complain about the stories in Sonic games, a pretty good ground rule you may want to lay first is to avoid praising the Advance/Rush titles for their deep and well fleshed-out plots.Maou-Shin Daioka said:most stories in recent Sonic games (except Rush) are pure rubbish
Fix'd that point.Ashovare said:TimberWolf said:I still think it's better that it's getting mroe serious. It started with SA1, really, when Chaos flooded Station Square. It's obvious that hundreds of men, women adn children drowned.
I like how Sonic is serious about saving Earth. It was cool how Station Square got flooded, but I'm too stupid to realize that no matter what people would end up dieing.
Obviously you didn't acknowledge the fact that I presented. People consider Shadow a badass character, SEGA does research on badass characters and what do they find? That the current badass characters useAshovare said:TimberWolf said:And then SA2 shows the ARK incident, Prison Island exploding and Shadow's "death".
Shadow was just carrying on the seriousness, and it's cool to have characters die sometimes. As well, SEGA and ST knew that Shadow wasn't a SONIC game but a SHADOW game, adn they knew that people considered Shadow bad-ass in SA2, so they researched bad-ass video game characters and what did they find? That bad-ass video game characters nowadays USE GUNS AND VEHICLES.
Yeah, and why on Earth does Shadow need any of those things? He’s got Chaos control, homing attack, and on top of all that; it’s not Sonic Series style. Would you ever expect to see Sonic whip out a gun? No! He uses homing attack, and his speed. He’s faster than any car anyway, and so is Shadow.
Shadow. Never. Died. Go play Sonic 2, SOnic 3 or Sonic & Knuckles and get to the end. As well, play Sonic Rush and get to the last level. And get the Sonic Advance series and unlock the special ending. You'll see what I mean.Ashovare said:TimberWolf said:As well, Shadow got a huuuuuuuuuge fanbase after SA2 that wanted Shadow back, and they didn't kill Shadow in the first place. Hence, Shadow's return. Along with a new plot point.
Shadow’s death was heart felt, and they just brought him back with no explanation. Oh look, there he is in a container. Well how’d he get there!? Also, it seems Sega never went anywhere with his story after that, what was with all those Shadows in containers? Also, Sega turned Eggman evil again, he turned good in SA2B. Why ruin it?
So you want SOnic to return to 2D, where it will thus die ou? You WANT Sonic to die? I guess that I'm the only true Sonic fan. I KNOW that Sonic would've died out long ago if it hadn't EVOLVED WITH THE GAMING INDUSTRY.Ashovare said:TimberWolf said:SEGA listens to their Sonic fans.
Don’t make me laugh. Did they change the voice actors back? thousands of people have petitioned to get the original voice actors back. Did they listen? No. Also, fans want Sonic and the Sonic Series back to the way it was, even if it had to go back to 2D. And Sega just keeps changing Sonic Series for the worse, ignoring the majority of their fans completely. Instead of gaining new fans with this new approach, they’re losing fans. Before you say something like, “More fans want it to change,” in case you haven’t noticed everyone this site, except like, two, wants Sonic and The Sonic Series back to the way they were, and 99% us here think Sonic I awesome, and are devoted to the Sonic Series.
So you WANT Sonic to be dead and buried? So you AREN'T a Sonic fan? I started with Sonic 2, and when I played Sonic R I compared the 2. If SEGA had stayed with 2D as with Sonic 2, Sonic R would've never appeared because you CAN'T HAVE A RACING GAME IN 2D.Maou-Shin Daioka said:TimberWolf, stop speweing random crap out of your mouth.
maybe Sonic going back to 2-D is what he needs.
Obviously his leap to 3-D was not a good one (and you know it) and yet you still claim that these failures from Sonic Team are saving Sonic?
Bullcrap. Just random bullcrap, that you are spweing out of your mouth, just to win an argument.
So this has what happened to fanboys that ignore the fact that Sonic Team screwed, (and soon to be killed) Sonic over.
So the creators are the killers? THAT'S where it's obvious that you want Sonic dead and buried, because you're saying that SEGA should never had created Sonic in the first place by saying that they're killing it!Maou-Shin Daioka said:that Sonic Team and Sega is killing Sonic.
I've played all of the Genesis games (save MBM) and all of the GG games (save Spinball and MBM) on emulators. You're just a classic fanboy that can't accept anything new. The only game with glitches is Sonic'06.Maou-Shin Daioka said:Yes, you can play the recent games and then the classics and see MAJOR gameplay differences
The differences I have is that I still, even to this day, love the classic Sonic gameplay, that had true speed, something, you've probally, never experienced.
You can see little to no glitches in the classic games, but in recent games, there are bugs and glitches almost everywhere you go (the 3-D ones.)
Now tell me that New Sonic is better than Old Sonic.
If you tell me other than the latter, then that proves you aren't a real sonic fan ( a real one, in my opinion, would have played the classics.)
TimberWolf said:I've played all of the Genesis games (save MBM) and all of the GG games (save Spinball and MBM) on emulators. You're just a classic fanboy that can't accept anything new. The only game with glitches is Sonic'06.Maou-Shin Daioka said:Yes, you can play the recent games and then the classics and see MAJOR gameplay differences
The differences I have is that I still, even to this day, love the classic Sonic gameplay, that had true speed, something, you've probally, never experienced.
You can see little to no glitches in the classic games, but in recent games, there are bugs and glitches almost everywhere you go (the 3-D ones.)
Now tell me that New Sonic is better than Old Sonic.
If you tell me other than the latter, then that proves you aren't a real sonic fan ( a real one, in my opinion, would have played the classics.)
If you want to go fast, try using the analog stick instead of shoving the controller up your ass. Oh make sure that you know what the jump/homing attack button is.