Symary
Hi
Symary submitted a new resource:
Long jump - Lua
Read more about this resource...
Nice
Long jump - Lua
Read more about this resource...
Post automatically merged:
Nice
Resource icon
- Thread starter Symary
- Start date
Welcome to releases!
Xenon The Hedgehog
One thing, i don't know why
can you BLJ with it?
Symary
Hi
I Think so
I have a feeling that this mod is AI-generated.
For one, it uses a very convoluted method for thrusting the player forwards and upwards. This is weird because P_InstaThrust and P_SetObjectMomZ exist.
Secondly, it uses some very weird syntax. Like using the "then" keyword and directly checking if jumped equals 0??
This can all be excused as just their style of programming, but then I saw this line...
ChatGPT (and most other AIs) that generate code have a tendency to generate "optional" lines like this. This would NOT make sense to include if you made the code yourself.
To confirm, I decided to ask ChatGPT to make me a long jump script for srb2 as well and here's the result:
Outside of a few (frankly pointless) extra lines, its mostly exactly the same, using the same weird thrusting method as well as having an "optional" line like before.
This is very disappointing; I would have expected that a judge would have pointed this out before accepting it into releases. D:
for the record, this is what I asked
For one, it uses a very convoluted method for thrusting the player forwards and upwards. This is weird because P_InstaThrust and P_SetObjectMomZ exist.
Secondly, it uses some very weird syntax. Like using the "then" keyword and directly checking if jumped equals 0??
This can all be excused as just their style of programming, but then I saw this line...
ChatGPT (and most other AIs) that generate code have a tendency to generate "optional" lines like this. This would NOT make sense to include if you made the code yourself.
To confirm, I decided to ask ChatGPT to make me a long jump script for srb2 as well and here's the result:
Outside of a few (frankly pointless) extra lines, its mostly exactly the same, using the same weird thrusting method as well as having an "optional" line like before.
This is very disappointing; I would have expected that a judge would have pointed this out before accepting it into releases. D:
Post automatically merged:
for the record, this is what I asked
Symary
Hi
Yes! The Ai actually helped me to make that
To be fair, everyone SHOULD be doing this, omitting them from SRB2's BLua was a bad crutch
blacc
Member
Ladies and gentlemen, we have officially reached a new low.
But instead of AI Art being allowed here, it's code. Make sure not to steal from it now, because it's not open assets!
Have we seriously let something like this slip by? I thought we were meant to quote unquote "protect" people from AI Usage. Like how we "protected" people from getting their code and sprites stolen and used for something else - so why are we letting ChatGPT write code for addons?
This just adds more fuel to the fire to the reusability system and it's problems: should ChatGPT be always open assets? Would you get a takedown by stealing code from an AI? Would the code the AI wrote go to the publisher?
If we're really letting AI write the code for public addons that is a concerning issue and paints this site in a bad picture, especially since this is considered an "art community" nowadays. Because stealing code from AI is okay makes no sense for the rest of everyone else - especially if the publisher gets the right for said code in the first place!
Look, I know this just got released, but we might as well figure out where AI code stands before things spiral even more out of control in the future.
There really should be more people looking through the submissions so stuff like this doesn't get ignored. I do not want to go through the forum just to find something that was completely made by humans. If you're going to say no to AI generated content, I expect you to keep that promise.
But instead of AI Art being allowed here, it's code. Make sure not to steal from it now, because it's not open assets!
Have we seriously let something like this slip by? I thought we were meant to quote unquote "protect" people from AI Usage. Like how we "protected" people from getting their code and sprites stolen and used for something else - so why are we letting ChatGPT write code for addons?
This just adds more fuel to the fire to the reusability system and it's problems: should ChatGPT be always open assets? Would you get a takedown by stealing code from an AI? Would the code the AI wrote go to the publisher?
If we're really letting AI write the code for public addons that is a concerning issue and paints this site in a bad picture, especially since this is considered an "art community" nowadays. Because stealing code from AI is okay makes no sense for the rest of everyone else - especially if the publisher gets the right for said code in the first place!
Look, I know this just got released, but we might as well figure out where AI code stands before things spiral even more out of control in the future.
There really should be more people looking through the submissions so stuff like this doesn't get ignored. I do not want to go through the forum just to find something that was completely made by humans. If you're going to say no to AI generated content, I expect you to keep that promise.
GavyFreshMen
stupid dumb idiot
oh that's gross, this mod doesn't even seem that complex and yet you felt the need to generate it with AI
GavyFreshMen
stupid dumb idiot
is it really "HIS" mod if he had an AI make it?
redhot69
amongus
he said he used it to fix his code not to make the whole mod
Julia
The only SRB2 and Touhou fan ever to exist lmao
I'm reading the code myself, and, okay, even if whatever he wrote before didn't work and he had to get AI to rewrite his code to work, practically none of the code is actually written by him anymore. In the state the mod is in right now, ChatGPT basically made the mod for him.
...with that being said, code is likely the least bad thing you can get an AI to generate for you. Still, I wouldn't be caught dead doing it, and I'd advise reading up on the Wiki and learning to do it yourself. As Gavy and Bartz have said, what this is doing isn't too complicated. You don't NEED AI to make something like this, even if you're a novice.
GavyFreshMen
stupid dumb idiot
My point exactly, i tried playing the mod myself, and all it really does is slightly launch you upwards and forwards, it doesn't even alter the player state in any way so you can do it while walking, rolling, spindashing etc. which makes the person using AI to make it even more bafflling
cheeseboi.
ches
what
don’t get me wrong, i completely suck at coding, but at least i take the effort to try and find out what’s wrong with something myself when things go wrong, by looking at the wiki and open assets mods.
dude, those two things i said help. A LOT. try it.
i’ve never used ai to code, (and probably never will), but even if i did, i’d make sure the majority of the code is by me.
don’t get me wrong, i completely suck at coding, but at least i take the effort to try and find out what’s wrong with something myself when things go wrong, by looking at the wiki and open assets mods.
dude, those two things i said help. A LOT. try it.
i’ve never used ai to code, (and probably never will), but even if i did, i’d make sure the majority of the code is by me.
lucas1037482
Member
ITS A MARIO REFERENCE!
Yes
Last edited:
gober04
(Insert Text here)
I hate AI Art but ai code is something else. This is your first mod then i can see why you used AI because you have no idea what your doing but AI mostly ruins the actual time spent in coding. Like i thought you were using AI to help you and then i saw the script. I really hope you can improve from this. aside from that, good mod and all.
Just don't use AI again ok?
Post automatically merged:
Just don't use AI again ok?
Post automatically merged:
I may have an idea on how this was submitted. Maybe the judge thought they added a tutorial to the lua code and submitted it.
Last edited: