Point one Akuma TH.Akuma TH said:Sonic characters are all fur so,like,theres no problem.
Sonic,Knuckles,Tails,etc. are naked so dosent that mean whoever has an avatar with the characters hole body will be banned?
Doesn't Tikal wear a dress? :?Draykon said:Tikal's the same deal, I think it's safe to assume that the only reason Sonic characters wear clothes is for style. So I wouldn't consider it pornographic.
Yes, but she dosen't wear panties, and I pay too much attention.shado said:Doesn't Tikal wear a dress? :?Draykon said:Tikal's the same deal, I think it's safe to assume that the only reason Sonic characters wear clothes is for style. So I wouldn't consider it pornographic.
Maou-Shin Daioka said:Then if Shado has a good point, then, should every official art piece of Sonic be considered a pornographic picture?
All (excluding Blaze the Cat, Amy, Cream, Wave, Jet, Storm and Tikal), of the Sonic series furries are nude, and yet people don't make a big deal out of it.
It's just a sprite, meant to be humorous, not to be viewed, in an erotic fashion.
Maou-Shin Daioka said:(1.)Then if Shado has a good point, then, should every official art piece of Sonic be considered a pornographic picture?
(2.)All (excluding Blaze the Cat and Tikal), of the Sonic series furries are nude, and yet people don't make a big deal out of it.