The Cheat 1.2 (For Mac Only)

[JRose]

The Cheat is a universal game trainer for Mac OS X. It empowers you to cheat in games which otherwise don't provide cheats. It also opens up many possibilities to expand your gaming experience in unpredictable ways.

The Cheat website
http://www.brokenzipper.com/thecheat/

Now the Mac fans can cheat on there games as well. I just started playing with this.

 

[NeoJames]

Woo!

Great joy!

I gotta look into this

 

[Flame]

I can see many MAC OS X users hacking SRB2 with this.

 

[NeoJames]

Same, but I'm pretty sure SRB2 for mac won't ever work online

I can however see it happening to the off-line SRB2, and that dosn't harm anyone

 

[JRose]

I asked the Cheat Engine forums why they don't a Mac version.

From a Site Admin

sorry, but macs are too secure. They don't allow tampering with memory. Imagine, that would decrease the stability of those systems, and might open the way to viruses...
And might make it as instable as Microsoft windows!!!! (gasp)

So, no.

But don't take it too hard , the way windows vista is going there's probably not gong to be a vista 64 version either

 

[Blitzzo]

...Are you trying to ruin netplay on purpose?

 

[JRose]

...Are you trying to ruin netplay on purpose?

The Mac version of SRB2 has no netplay.

 

[Chao Freak 1]

...Are you trying to ruin netplay on purpose?

The Mac version of SRB2 has no netplay.

Correct! Macs only use one port, and you can't set up any more. So SRB2 netplay on Mac is impossible.

 

[AlamGBC]

...Are you trying to ruin netplay on purpose?

The Mac version of SRB2 has no netplay.

Correct! Macs only use one port, and you can't set up any more. So SRB2 netplay on Mac is impossible.

LIES, all I did is compiled SRB2Mac without the network support on the PowerPC version, the Intel binary in SRB2Mac's netplay works

 

[JRose]

Why did you not put network support on the PowerPC version?

 

[Blitzzo]

My guess would be consistency failures between PowerPC and X86 builds, though I could be totally wrong.

 

[AlamGBC]

My guess would be consistency failures between PowerPC and X86 builds, though I could be totally wrong.

oh no, the play code should work and not make any consistency failures, but the network code is not BIG ENDIAN friendly, just like the software rendering code, I just did not want to spend time debugging them on a college MacOSX system very late in the night....

 

[wise.rain]

From a Site Admin

sorry, but macs are too secure. They don't allow tampering with memory. Imagine, that would decrease the stability of those systems, and might open the way to viruses...
And might make it as instable as Microsoft windows!!!! (gasp)

Lol, they're not that secure if you know how to tamper with it, you can already run Windows Vista on a Mac, and they're still not too sure whether you can get viruses or not, so viruses are just a risk people will have to take. Besides, there's only been one viruse for a Mac, and I think it was a very old one (though I'm not too sure).

 

[LoganA]

Lol, they're not that secure if you know how to tamper with it, you can already run Windows Vista on a Mac, and they're still not too sure whether you can get viruses or not, so viruses are just a risk people will have to take. Besides, there's only been one viruse for a Mac, and I think it was a very old one (though I'm not too sure).

Mac hardware != Mac OS X
just because you can run and break Windows on (x86) Mac hardware, doesn't mean you can do the same thing with Mac OS X on Mac hardware.

 

[tailsy]

wut???

 

[Dreamcaster]

wut???

I lol'd.