Chibs
Just Someone
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/41217/Sub-standard-Sonics-de-listed
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=409502
http://www.sonicstadium.org/news/2010/10/sega-removing-poor-and-average-sonic-titles-from-retail/
....yeeeaaaah, that last one is a TSS article.
Also, on the NeoGaf board, they've complied a -probably unofficial- list of the games that Sega is most likely to pull.
Personally, this really just strikes me as pretty much the entire opposite of what SEGA seems to have been doing for years now: churning out the shit because they know it'll sell hundreds of thousands of copies and bring in the cash.
But I do have one big question: what's the damned point? Just make your new, self-proclaimed better Sonic games and keep the shit around because it's still going to sell. I can understand that, in some cases, critical success may affect sales, but that didn't stop Shadow the Hedgehog from becoming a PS2 Player's Choice title, did it?
So now, what do you think about this rather unpredictable turn of events?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=409502
http://www.sonicstadium.org/news/2010/10/sega-removing-poor-and-average-sonic-titles-from-retail/
....yeeeaaaah, that last one is a TSS article.
...Wasn't Sonic Rush a critical success?SEGA has removed Sonic games with average Metacritic scores from shop shelves to combat franchise fatigue.
"Any Sonic game with an average Metacritic has been de-listed," SEGA's SVP of EMEA Jurgen Post told MCV.
"We have to do this and increase the value of the brand. This will be very important when more big Sonic releases arrive in the future."
SEGA's set to release three Sonic games in the coming months: downloadable title Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode 1 (the iPhone version's out now), Nintendo platforms exclusive Sonic Colours and Kinect racing game Sonic Free Riders.
"We could make a lot of money on back-catalogue Sonic titles, but let's keep the number of Sonic games available under control. Otherwise you can have cannibalisation. If there are ten Sonic games on the shelves, with people seeing Sonic Rush DS or Sonic Rush Adventure, this may not help our overall strategy."
Also, on the NeoGaf board, they've complied a -probably unofficial- list of the games that Sega is most likely to pull.
So those are the details, really. SEGA wants to "freshen up" their mascot's image by removing all mediocre games released in the last 10 years or so.OK, just looking through metacritic, these games are being pulled (current gen only):
Sonic the Hedgehog 2006
Sonic Unleashed
Sonic and the Black Knight
Sonic Classic Collection DS
Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood
Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Winter Games
Sonic and the Secret Rings
Sonic Riders: Zero Gravity
Sonic Rivals
Sonic Rivals 2
and these are staying:
Sonic & Sega All-Stars Racing
Sonic Rush
Sonic Rush Adventure
Sonic’s Ultimate Genesis Collection
Personally, this really just strikes me as pretty much the entire opposite of what SEGA seems to have been doing for years now: churning out the shit because they know it'll sell hundreds of thousands of copies and bring in the cash.
But I do have one big question: what's the damned point? Just make your new, self-proclaimed better Sonic games and keep the shit around because it's still going to sell. I can understand that, in some cases, critical success may affect sales, but that didn't stop Shadow the Hedgehog from becoming a PS2 Player's Choice title, did it?
So now, what do you think about this rather unpredictable turn of events?