Post Yer Pictures
- Thread starter Spazzo
- Start date
- Status
B
Bigboi
Guest
Are you older than what you look like in that picture?
B
Bigboi
Guest
hotdog003 said:
You keep on talking about yo' momma, so I'd say 13 or so.
Is that pic of you old? You look really young there.
You could try your hard drive.
Or inside your digital camera.
Heck, take a picture of yourself with said camera.
Or inside your digital camera.
Heck, take a picture of yourself with said camera.
brianv said:Well, um, heres me...
Don't laugh! Its the best picture of me that I could find on gamespot!
I, Al Gore, am not amused.
Here's me, it's from a project in my Photoshop class last year:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/3408/realshuf6os.jpg
And here's an animation of me in a PSO environment (if you look carefully, you can find my real name in that picture >_>):
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3663/psoanim6bf.gif
Warning, it's fing huge.
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/3408/realshuf6os.jpg
And here's an animation of me in a PSO environment (if you look carefully, you can find my real name in that picture >_>):
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3663/psoanim6bf.gif
Warning, it's fing huge.
B
Bigboi
Guest
Shadow Hog said:
I, Al Gore, am not amused.
Oh, so you're Al Gore? Did you really create the internet? And the fire spirit?
BSD
I hate to start a flamewar here, but, tails92, exactly what does BSD have that GNU/Linux doesn't? In fact, GNU/Linux is developing much more rapidly than BSD. Also, GNU/Linux is the only open source operating system that has gained market share.
However, if GNU/Linux weren't an option, I'd totally use BSD. I just honestly don't see any advantages to BSD. If you're going to say security, Linux can be plenty secure with SELinux (which implements manditory access control) and using good cryptography (GNU/Linux, like BSD, supports encrypted filesystems).
Nick
I hate to start a flamewar here, but, tails92, exactly what does BSD have that GNU/Linux doesn't? In fact, GNU/Linux is developing much more rapidly than BSD. Also, GNU/Linux is the only open source operating system that has gained market share.
However, if GNU/Linux weren't an option, I'd totally use BSD. I just honestly don't see any advantages to BSD. If you're going to say security, Linux can be plenty secure with SELinux (which implements manditory access control) and using good cryptography (GNU/Linux, like BSD, supports encrypted filesystems).
Nick
tails92
Member
nick said:
:? this isn't the topic for this ...
Well, *BSD is more stable, speedy and has better license than Linux.
In addition, *BSD can emulate Linux binaries (I emulated SRB2! :) ) and NetBSD is available virtually for any machine on the world
Wait me on Slashdot or OSNews, we'll probably meet some day there...
The BSD licence says that any software under the BSD licence can be used in *any* other program. Including commercial software.
*coughcoughwindazcoughcough*
It's a well known fact that Microsoft was lazy enough to rip the BSD TCP/IP stack helper instead of coding their own. Or so I've heard. :|
*coughcoughwindazcoughcough*
It's a well known fact that Microsoft was lazy enough to rip the BSD TCP/IP stack helper instead of coding their own. Or so I've heard. :|
tails92
Member
hotdog003 said:
Is the reason because BSD license is better. GPL at my opinion makes commercial programmers always re-inventing the wheel... and this isn't good.
Mac OS Xhotdog003 also said:
hotdog003 said:
It was not ripped from BSD, but from Spider Software. And guess from what OS was the TCP/IP stack? From BSD. This is the reason because we say "the windaze tcp/ip stack is from BSD".
And note, that Windows has the BSD tcp/ip stack starting with Win2k
Proprietary software makers reinventing the wheel is better than me writing code only for it to be used in proprietary software without giving me any credit for the work I put in. Yes, BSD is more stable, and can run on ancient machines. However, BSD does not necessarily run on more machines. You need to take into account microcontrollers. BSD cannot run on microcontrollers, although uClinux can. Anyways, the one thing that angers me the most about BSD is the licensing. I can't stand the thought of having proprietary software developers use my free software (free as in freedom) and basically use me as a free developer, without me making any sort of profit while they make money off of my code... I prefer the GPL because it ensures that the community can use my code, without it being stolen.
- Status