on Edge said:You regestered two days ago. Why do you expect anything?
Andy said:'Kay, first off, what's a HOM bug?
Joined Date does NOT equal how long someone has been here. I don't understand why you're being so cocky, but it's very distasteful. Everyone can lurk around. As a matter of fact, I've been around here longer than you, despite my Joined Date (truth, also to some people; wink wink >.> (2003/2004, around the transition of Demo 4.35 and 1.08)).on Edge said:You regestered two days ago. Why do you expect anything?
Releases Section Rules said:R1. The releases section, and some topics in Editing, are designed to be used for constructive criticism. There seems to be some questions about what constitutes constructive criticism around here, so please use these helpful examples:
"This WAD is awful. Here's why: List" - Constructive. This clearly explains what is wrong with the WAD and even how it could be fixed.
"This WAD is awful." - Not constructive. This doesn't explain anything about the WAD, and simply states a useless opinion. Keep this junk off the forum.
"This WAD is awesome." - Not constructive. Just like the previous, this simply states a useless opinion. Mindless positive feedback is just as useless as mindless negative feedback.
"You are awful." - Not constructive. This is a direct flame of another user, and is strictly forbidden on all forums.
With this in mind, remember that all WADs posted on these forums will be criticized. If you don't want the public tearing apart your WAD and telling you what you did wrong, don't post on these forums. However, if you'd like to get feedback on your WAD, and suggestions on how to make it better, you're in the right place.
Prime 2.0 said:after a look at the map in DB, the problems I find are simple:
Control sectors use all linedefs for the FOFs; only one linedef on the control sector need be used for this purpose.
Identical control sectors for separate FOFs; a single FOF can be placed on two separate sectors at once by using the same control sector for both, but a different linedef for each sector it goes to. This saves a bit of space on the map, and makes it less CPU intensive by reducing the FOF count.
Grid missalignment; several vertices, linedefs, and sectors are displaced slightly from the grid at sizes 32, 16, 8, and 4. This is a common problem that occurs when performing movement actions while still having some other things selected, and the displacement is fairly uniform within each area. Not really a big problem, really, but kind of annoying.
Some in-level that could be merged without ill effects remain separate.
Finally, the use of FOFs in place of lower unpegged linedef textures for the placement of flags.
All these are things that I may fix if I find the time; but I can't really play a map as complex as this with my computer being as slow as it has been recently. Andy, I'd like it if you would contact me on IRC so I can find out what is intentional and what is not among the stuff I see in the map so that my changes do not conflict with what the map is supposed to be like.
In openGL, you see what's called REDWALL instead of HOM.lucius octavion said:I couldn't see any HOMs or bugs in openGl, but I don't know about software.
Spazzo said:Andy, this level sucks. Never make levels again. D=
Um..if you had read the rest of Spazzo's post, you would have realized that he was kidding.Yuni said:Spazzo said:Andy, this level sucks. Never make levels again. D=
Spazzo, you should stop and look at your levels too. They're not that amazing...