I highly agree with Earuto. There's a LOT of ignorance towards how the Dreamcast died. Shoulda anyone assume it failed, you all should read the facts and know your Sega better. The Dreamcast didn't fail because it "sucked". It had great promos (such as subscribe to SegaNet and get a free Dreamcast) and plenty of 3rd party developers. If anything was failing, it was the Gamecube. Nintendo just had a good reserve of cash. If anyone wants the story, look at Eidolon's Inn (The Sega Base). The Dreamcast would've run DVD-Roms but due to the recent (at the time) budget problems they settle for GD-Rom which was very prone to piracy. It would've cost Sega $10.5 Million to include DVD-ROM capability during development. That's right, it would also play DVD's. It's not that Sega didn't want to make it DVD-ROM capable. It knew that would be a major blow towards the sales of the Dreamcast. They simply couldn't afford it especially after the over-hyped 32X shortage fiasco and the rarely advertised Sega Saturn which was also missing it's main Sonic game. At the time, DVD-ROM was very, and I mean very expensive back then when it was emerging. A big blow to the console was the fact that a lot of people would start all this piracy crap up which hurt sales even more, despite the Dreamcast DID sell well at launch in the U.S. but Sega pretty much lost Japan due to the PS2 (I hate Sony so much). One reason, read closely, one reason why the Dreamcast was the last console was because it was a promise that Peter Moore kept because Isao Okawa, the former chairman of Sega, told him that Sega should move on, make the Dreamcast the last console, and settle to become a 3rd party developer before he passed away in 2001. Peter Moore kept that promise. The current President of Sega is a douche. If you guys haven't seen that YouTube video of those two guys giving him the idea of the Dreamcast 2, you'll know what I mean.
Sorry for the history lesson, but that's nothing compared to the full thing.