Search results for query: *

A surprising change to the status quo, but I suppose quite a welcome one. Though I want to inquire further about clarificiations as to the naming scheme that's been laid out. In terms of, for example "ex_Thing_v2.1" becoming ported into "ex_Thing_IsaPort", how would the naming scheme go about...

Т-54 Standalone - You can take the T-54 out of CCCP, can't take the СССР out of T-54 A staple character of the CCCP I'd say pack but with the acronym's meaning that'd be redundant, the 1-speed 9-weight Т-54 now also has an independent version to use. ...But why? Well, CCCP is going to be...

The Hornet that wants to fly sky high! ...But it's not an F/A-18 Hornet, nor is it an actual hornet, so it has to make do with being a fast NASCAR car. * Note: Most of this is a staggering amount of creative liberty, and probably has minimal to do with the actual games Also this seemed way...

Т-54 Standalone - You can take the T-54 out of CCCP, can't take the СССР out of T-54 A staple character of the CCCP I'd say pack but with the acronym's meaning that'd be redundant, the 1-speed 9-weight Т-54 now also has an independent version to use. ...But why? Well, CCCP is going to be...

A not at all quick because I was thinking there was something else that was needing fixing when there wasn't hotfix update, turns out online splitscreen interiors/HUD didn't quite work. ...Probably because I never had the splitscreen players join in as non-spectators due to not having binds for...

Despite its odd absence earlier, the AT has now also joined for the races. ...Whichever races these two will find, anyway.

Noted, spoilered anything short of the stuff listed in abilities, also the instructions go away automatically after a certain time has passed. ..Which admittedly is probably not ideal for a host.

The Hornet that wants to fly sky high! ...But it's not an F/A-18 Hornet, nor is it an actual hornet, so it has to make do with being a fast NASCAR car. * Note: Most of this is a staggering amount of creative liberty, and probably has minimal to do with the actual games Also this seemed way...

Thought this one was mildly amusing, atleast:

That seems to have been addressed before 1.0.2 was out, actually

Right, I know it's technically not a bug you see in the vanilla game, and since I'm not in the Discord group I have no idea if it was mentioned but uh, The secondcolor script in software works fine But in OpenGL, despite the fact I can confirm it didn't happen in 1.0.1, and yes as an OGL player...

I've noticed that a few parts at the last turn of Daytona Speedway are considered by the game as off-road portions despite having a road texture.

Got a slight minor complaint, but it's more with the OP than the wad itself The record attack song doesn't seem to be credited, which stood out to me since I got pretty hyped when I heard it. Forget the Hornet, Opel Speedster for Kart when.

...No. That's not only highly ignoring all of the other arguements brought for the reason of keeping it in, but also missing the context. Crawla-bouncing was mainly used as a demonstration in Sryder's proof of concept camera, which I have to say is way better than what we currently have and...

...So you'd fix the problem with, along with the tutorial stage, the simple fix of turning vertical mouselook off by default instead of fixing the camera to be like in Jazzz's second gif and second embedded picture in the post and the other game which I've posted screenshots of before? It could...

Did get a reply about it when bringing it up. And I can confirm that, while trying 1.09 or 2.0 after being used to 2.1, the mouse sensitivity felt quite a bit different. Also, just tried windowed DirectDraw myself, mouse movement does feel more sluggish than windowed SDL2 even on 1280x800, a...

I'm aware, I was just talking about the game demonstrated in those screenshots.

Again, do suspect that this would either be down to the mouse sensitivity being high by default, or human error depending on how much the mouse moved forward/backward. But hey, this is your choice that you've made after finding out you can change it, so I can support that. My concern, however...

...We've went over this already, but there's a fair likelihood that a portion of newer players either won't go to the options or won't be aware that it could be turned on/off.

I do wish that this would have been elaborated on a bit more as to how that is the conclusion that was achieved, so there could have been extra input on it. Alright, fair enough then. I suppose I can get behind that. Do wonder how detrimental it is to not have it in said situations where its...