Bigboi said:
And most critics are insanely stuck up to begin with.
Well yea thats a fact too. But really, most of the smart critics that we go to for opinions are really ourselves. We are the ulitmate critics in the world that pretty much either can making something look good or purposly destroy it. So people like IGN or gamepro can't really be the blame.
But we must be able to support opinions reasons and really know what makes games good besides generic crap we see now. I'd say unleashed was good, but it just looks like sonic X turned into a video game if you observe long enough to realize it. Not to mention the plot would of been planed better IF the werehog wasn't created (doesn't mean I don't like him though. He felt..alright as a temporary alter ego).
What should it should of been:
Sonic gets trapped, emeralds are drained of their negative energy but sonic does not turn, instead....sonic looses his current abilities and during his travels he regains them back as he returns the emeralds to the gaia temples (classic retro style..but makes sence a little).
what about the night stages? Think of it like shadow's stages in SA2, but for sonic.
What about combat that was promised? Many people add in knuckles for this. yea it makes sence and most of the stuff you see werehog preforming is why knuckles should be in it (without stretchy arms that is.)
And you know what??? They could of made a side-story too that fits in with the main plot (Sonic adventure, where things become clear after playing as multiple characters).
Though this thought will be chalenged by "night of the werehog" and archie comic's preview comic of unleashed.
