Okay, hold the fuck up here. I'm not remotely related to this argument, but it seems to me that if you're suggesting someone watch a THREE HOUR REVIEW of a game for ANY reason whatsoever, something is wrong with your argument. I can BEAT any of the good Sonic games in the time it takes to watch the review you're suggesting he watch. While I question the sanity of whoever made a three hour video review of a game that can't be all that much longer than that if you take out the cutscenes, I question your sanity even more for being willing to put up with watching such a thing front to back. It sounds to me like you desperately want to justify liking a bad game when that simply isn't necessary.Do you really not know? Have you not seen anything like Clement's 3-hour review...
Sonic Boom Wii U is a bad game. Even ignoring the memes and the jokes, it has a Metacritic score of 32. Sonic 2K6 for 360, commonly joked about across the world for how terrible it is, has a Metacritic score of 46 for comparison. While I'm not of the opinion that Metacritic has a huge amount of meaning in exactly what the number is, going below 60 is a sign that something has gone very, very wrong.
The thing is, just because a game is objectively terrible doesn't mean you can't enjoy it. I would wager that a large number of people have directly or indirectly had lots of fun with Sonic 2K6 despite how rubbish it is. Bad movies are watched on purpose for exactly this reason. It's totally okay to like Sonic Boom and enjoy playing it! As a child I liked Bubsy for the love of god. It's just important to know that just because you're having fun doesn't mean you should defend it as a good game, and considering the overwhelming evidence that's been posted just about everywhere, I think it's pretty damn clear Sonic Boom is pretty terrible.