Search results for query: *

It's a perfectly safe assumption to assume that players of this game would have at least played the first zone of the default level set, along with some others.

You should know as well as I do that we don't need to start a level pack with zero difficulty when we've already mastered the controls. We've experienced short and unsatisfying level design with GFZ1 and we don't need to again whenever someone decides to make a new level pack. Arguing semantics...

Why do we need a pitifully short and easy tutorial level when we've already played GFZ1 countless times by now?

Can't use Pt.?

http://mb.srb2.org/showthread.php?t=30752

Mad Gadget > Neo Canyon > Gleaming Cavern > Fire Castle > Eggslimer Battle > Thawing Icecap Generic Canyon > Match Meadow > Volcanic Valley > Refrigerator > Angel Lava Final Destination > Mine Maze > Mount Revolvius I played in the same games as Katmint and my comments are basically the same as...

Make the boss easier. The player can also abuse Metal Sonic's invincibility frames and simply charge a spin rather than using invincibility to keep Metal Sonic at bay until he eventually dies and the level is over. The problem is that this particular bonus is both easy to access and very...

Why do you have an invincibility monitor that completely trivializes the Metal Sonic battle?

When Sonic is designed to do absolutely nothing but going fast in a straight line, level design by nature is extremely difficult: Sonic is completely uncontrollable at high speeds and at such speeds cannot require much input from the player; when slowed down he's floaty and stiff, unsuited for...

$10 + $15 != $0

Whenever Sonic isn't being thrown around by springs and boosters, he's using his Homing Attack in dull an unimaginative ways or is performing awkward and slow-paced platforming. Dimps is terrible at designing levels.

If it's too situational to be useful in most maps (and powerful enough for stupid things such as invisible walls to come into play because it completely breaks other maps), it's obviously not a well-designed mechanic and should be removed.

So, instead of a loving throwback or a proper sequel we get Springs and Boosters: The Game—as that video confirms. I can't say that I'm surprised, sadly.

It's almost completely automated, so no.

It's nothing special and it's not worth noting.

Why? It was never a good game to begin with.

Being forced to take pictures is incredibly lame because it stints the amount of participation available. I have over forty DS games in my library, so I'll only list my recently-played and currently-playing titles: Taiko no Tatsujin: Touch de Dokodon!! Meccha! Taiko no Tatsujin: Nanaratsu...

I remember back when people didn't make stupid-ass generalizations and exaggerations of an entire group based on one of the most minor and insignificant complaints ever made by them in desperate attempts to prove a point that deals with faulty logic.

Your "the fans only want classic Sonic" garbage is ridiculous. For one thing, you should know as well as I do that that's bullshit because a majority of them simply want a well-done game without shitty Werehogs, linear corridors, trial-and-error gameplay, and shallow and simplistic platforming...