Search results for query: *

Radicalicious is not a developer, so I'm here to make an official statement. Also, Radicalicious suggested that 2.3 might no longer support the old binary format. 2.3 will definitely still support binary maps.

I should probably set the record straight before rumors start to spread: Future versions of SRB2 will still support non-UDMF maps, at least for the forseeable future.

Fixed here: https://git.do.srb2.org/STJr/SRB2/-/merge_requests/1668

What you make of the log is up to you. I merely posted the context because without it, it looks like he's suggesting that the word isn't offensive, or shouldn't be considered offensive. No argument there, although I will note there were many other people involved in that conversation who said...

If we're going into quote mining now, I guess someone will have to supply the context (full disclosure: I removed unrelated lines that were posted in between. This was a public conversation, so you can look up the entire thing yourself if you feel like it): And to just make it extra clear...

I put "toxic presences" in quotation marks because it was a verbatim quote from softchassis' post. It was not intended to be sarcastic. Gaslighting means "manipulating people into questioning their own perception of reality". It's a really fucked up thing to do. Are you sure that's something...

On the flipside, the fact that several team members decided to leave as a direct result of this might suggest that things are not that cut and dry. An impression is being created here that Mystic, Rob and Prime 2.0 were "toxic presences" in the dev team and therefore had to be removed. It's...

Thank you for the kind words. I don't think it would be appropriate to go into detail here, but I assure you that I didn't make this decision lightly. It has nothing to do with being discouraged about a lack of progress. Things were making great progress. But unfortunately I no longer feel...

That was indeed the reason. But I'm not working on UDMF anymore either.

I have stopped maintaining Zone Builder. Please refrain from making feature requests in the future. The source code is archived at http://git.magicalgirl.moe/MascaraSnake/ZoneBuilder. If anyone wants to pick up the project, feel free to do so.

This has been discussed at length in this thread: https://mb.srb2.org/showthread.php?t=45747 And we're not going to go over all of that again.

In terms of the amount of data, it's CEZ2. In 2.2.2, it has about 43000 sidedefs, which is 65% of the sidedef limit. In 2.2.0, before we removed some of the unused and unfinished sections, it was closer to 50000 sidedefs, or about 75% of the overall limit. So in a very real sense, it's not...

I finally got around to making some much-needed adjustments to the 2.2 config, such as adding two missing linedef types and adjusting a bunch of flag labels. You can download the updated config from the opening post.

Here you go: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wrsd87m9uma8oq6/SRB2%20Workbench.zip?dl=0

Zone Builder is a clone of GZDoom Builder with some fairly superficial edits for better SRB2 support. Being dependent on DirectX, WinForms and .NET is something it inherits from GZDB, and I have neither the time nor the knowledge to change this. Recently, the people who were keeping GZDB...

Don't worry. This won't be the last you see of the hang gliders.

That's not correct. Work on the DSZ remake was started during 2.1 development, but it only got as far as (some of?) the textures and one incomplete act. Parts of that act were later cannibalized for what is now DSZ2, but the rest was made after 2.1's release. Yes. It was still very buggy in...

Mystic didn't say "the people who are not posting in this thread are happy with how things are". He said "the people who are happy with how things are are not posting in this thread".

Yes, it's this thread again. Now that 2.2 has been out for three weeks and you've had time to collect your thoughts, it's time for you to tell us what you think of the official levels. Rate on whatever scale you want (or not at all), comment on as many or as few stages as you feel like, but most...

2.2.0 already has support for using textures in place of flats. It's the other way around (using flats in place of textures) that had been missing so far. Yes. I haven't gotten around to updating ZB yet, so they display incorrectly in Visual Mode. The wiki page has already been updated...