Recent content by lnferno

I am very briefly re-emerging to say that, no, you cannot modify it anymore, the tag just wasn't removed with the permissions regarding the mod changed. Also, KGL's priority is on the other projects he is on (including things such as Sonic Legends and Sonic 1: South Island Expedition), as well...

Hi, yes. Take this document made by staff. https://srb2staff.notion.site/Icezer-Zeuvia-and-SuperPhanto-s-bans-ce26b6baafb6416689bef65058e41269 I can back the allegations, and in her case, it's arguably worse than the evidence staff got overall. (That is my rare cameo, folks!)

You can restrict a Lua script to running for just your character by checking player.mo.skin == "skinID". You need to specify in more detail beyond that. I'd suggest looking at how other characters handle their Lua scripts to get a better idea.

There is a LOT of them. A lot of whom are in scarily high positions of influence. So, yeaaa... Trust me, it ain't just Twitter arguments that bring this community down.

Not really bug I 'did', but one I was partially responsible for uncovering the root cause of. Have you ever gotten caught on a slope whilst rolling in the Sonic games, and then you lose all your speed? Well, Sonic 1: South Island Definitive ran into it as a frequent issue with it's pinch phase...

I'm pretty sure what he is referring to is the sheer hostility everyone exhibited towards him for his behavior, which is honestly just Thursday if you are on these forums. He acted up and got slapped silly by both people trying to civilly address his points and people being ultra-hostile, as was...

It's filled a game niche for me that no other really has, once past the "controversial" content.

This is in large part what I was getting at with half my message, btw. Thanks for wording it better.

Then you should have included that within the "INCLUDES" segment. You did leave a loophole if your intention was to not have the conversation exist outside of that context. You act like you were betrayed, but, not only did you not "explicitly" say that the conversation had to remain secret...

On the bright side, it is because of you that we even have that community post preserved WITH the acknowledgement, alongside me having tuned in at all.

After all, there wouldn't have even been a 2.1 update (which primarily toned down the main critiques of the tutorial and unlocks!) had Kart Krew been unreceptive to criticism. As I said earlier in this convo (either this thread or its' original thread), there is a difference between criticism...

From what Glaber himself has said: it went beyond criticism and into sheer toxicity to the point of it being unable to be tolerated. If you just check the first message after OP's in the thread, you see Glaber himself admitting this. Please read.

"You mean the conversation I explicitly told you to not share any details about" You yourself said that you said not to say any details. Did you ever specify that it couldn't be mentioned at all? Because this phrasing indicates just that she couldn't mention what WAS said, not that anything was...

The image itself: Even if her statement is fake, SandwichFace did, in fact, not delete it when he was told it was fake. Edit: I see his response. It is possible this happened later. Again. Drop it before mods forcefully steer this conversation back on course. As I said, we no longer need to...

What. Anyways, can we please just get back on topic?