The avatar I had this morning.

"...do you guys have any problems with this one?"

  • Yes, get rid of it!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I don't care ether way.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Keep it! Or I will kill you!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's where I stand.
Shuffle's avatar is funny, Shu's old avatar(The one posted) doesn't show anything so it shouldn't be a problem.
Shuffle's avatar is just two Pikachu in a strange position it's not "Dirty" or "Wrong". Shu, Flame and Shuffle have had somewhat "Sexual" avatars Shuffle's "Make like Sepwich and go down on me" Avatar, Which I personally LOVED. Shu's Few avatars including Rouge and the one that spawned this topic. Flame's avatars with the redheaded girl. Frankly the way I see it, if there is no visible Nudity or other rule breaking content there should be no problem.
I mean Jesus, There's worse stuff after all this is the internet.
Sorry if I came off a little Harsh, but this is ridiculous.
 
It's not ridiculous when you consider that SRB2 will attract not only older Sonic fans, but a younger age-set group. If I were a parent, I'd be very concerned walking into a room and seeing what Shu had for an avatar. See, the difference is that, at a glance, Shuffle's does not look at all sexual. It takes an observance. Parents will generally ignore Pikachu. The same isn't able to be said about what Shu had.

BlueZero4 said:
Yes, you came off harsh. You abused the name of Jesus. Shame on you.
Click to expand...

Please stop that. You know they won't.
 
BlueZero4 said:
Yes, you came off harsh. You abused the name of Jesus. Shame on you.
Click to expand...
Um... Actually no.
I didn't, and if I did it was unintentional.
I myself am a Christian so I don't generally intend to do that.
 
Please do not force your religious views on other people. It is, in my opinion, wrong, you should not force your religious views on others. Not trying to bash here, but if they wanna say 'Jesus', even as much as it upsets you, please, don't complain about it, they won't stop.

As for avatars... Some of them may be too much for some forum goers to handle on a mature level, as in not complaining about them for being of a seemingly, pornographic view. Those types of avatars should not be humorous at all, on another note, a sign that some people are not mature enough.
 
..No, you see, this isn't an "adult" message board. Young people do come here and see these things. Older members recognize this, and speak out. It does not mean that older members are "not mature enough to handle it." It means that the older members acknowledge the problem it causes.
 
True, this is not an adult message board, I should have taken that into consideration before posting. Sorry if I meant this, but I was preferably talking about the younger generation that usually can't handle material like that. I do see the problem it causes, young people objectiing to it, but it's not like they're going to be ignorant of these types of avatars in the future...

But I do see that younger members, shouldn't see it, even if they are mature to handle it, and some may even object to it. I was basing my previous post on my own personal opinions.
 
I can totally see why you're getting annoyyed by Shuffle's and Callum's avatars, Shu, as their suggestive avatars remain but your ones keep getting deleted. The difference between theirs and yours is that your avatars are intended to be... "arousing"... but Shuffle's and Callum's avatars are just for laughs.

I say stop being a jackass about it.
 
BlueZero4 said:
Yes, you came off harsh. You abused the name of Jesus. Shame on you.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that is starting to get annoying.
Also, I don't see a problem with mildly suggestive avatars. The minimum registration age on this board is 13 years. Penopat's is getting a little up there, though..
 
Penopat's isn't just up there, it's completely over the line. The thing is, there currently isn't a minimum age restriction to log into this forum, and while I'm not going to be all up in arms about protecting the children (that's their parents' job), there are things that are appropriate and things that clearly aren't appropriate for this demographic.

Shuffle's avatar is pushing it. Beyond that and you're over the line. Got it? Good.
 
I didn't like your old avatar Shu. The one you have right now is funny. But that one well.... Is to graphic for me. I am only 9-Years old and I do not like seeing graphic content. If you keep it like the avatar right now. Very funny. Then you will be a comedian instead of being a "pRon" freak. I have been looking at this forum for a long time now and I hated that rouge avatar you had. What i am trying to say is........ Let's just keep this forum Age-Friendly. Kay? :P
 
Mystic said:
Shuffle's avatar is pushing it.
Click to expand...

How should I put this? Let's see... Har, har,... har. I won't use the one I want to, but I demand that his is removed.
 
That reminds me of the Golden Ruins MB. Horrible multi-quote posts.

I'd say having a woman in your avatar is okay, just let her wear clothes, and its okay.
 
I've got nothing against "suggestive" or even mildly-sexual avatars.
10-11 year olds are going to see these "sexual" things in some years, anyway, and there's nothing bad about that.
Sexuality is part of life, get over it.
I like Shuffle and Callum's avatars and I think they're funny, too, but I dislike that "Wii" avatar that Shu had. I think it was just for crossing the line.
 
Just because they they'll see it eventually doesn't mean they should see it in their present state of mind. It may be a part of life, but that part of life has an appropriate time and place. It doesn't need to be displayed anywhere at anytime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who is viewing this thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Back
Top