Thats right, you cry. Cry it all out.SML89 said:....I'm leaving these MBs. *snifle* I knew I'd fool someone! You fell for it!
I always knew you were funny Fish hook!Fish hook said:Thats right, you cry. Cry it all out.SML89 said:....I'm leaving these MBs. *snifle* I knew I'd fool someone! You fell for it!
...btw, I can't feel sympothy!
YEAHA! Its times like this that I'm glad I'm autistic!
*dances to SIC by KoRn*
YOU
CANT
KILL
ME
CUZ
I'M
RE-ADY
INSIDE YOU!
SIIIIIIIIC
SIIIIIIIIC
SIIIIIIIIC....
...what?
Why ya all starin' at me? What?
I'm listening... Wait! I'm doing the SOCs, not the WADs.Fish hook said:Well what can I say?
Go download a copy of Crawley the Crawer. He has my voice.
<_<
>_>
Just to let you know, everyone round here gives constructive critisism. If some one says "That level sucked. Too many enimes" then instead of starting a flame war, delete some enimes and rerelease it.
SML89 said:I'm listening...Fish hook said:Well what can I say?
Go download a copy of Crawley the Crawer. He has my voice.
<_<
>_>
Just to let you know, everyone round here gives constructive critisism. If some one says "That level sucked. Too many enimes" then instead of starting a flame war, delete some enimes and rerelease it.
Releases Section - Rules said:R1. The releases section, and some topics in Editing, are designed to be used for constructive criticism. There seems to be some questions about what constitutes constructive criticism around here, so please use these helpful examples:
* "This WAD is awful. Here's why: List" - Constructive. This clearly explains what is wrong with the WAD and even how it could be fixed.
* "This WAD is awful." - Not constructive. This doesn't explain anything about the WAD, and simply states a useless opinion. Keep this junk off the forum.
* "This WAD is awesome." - Not constructive. Just like the previous, this simply states a useless opinion. Mindless positive feedback is just as useless as mindless negative feedback.
* "You are awful." - Not constructive. This is a direct flame of another user, and is strictly forbidden on all forums.
With this in mind, remember that all WADs posted on these forums will be criticized. If you don't want the public tearing apart your WAD and telling you what you did wrong, don't post on these forums. However, if you'd like to get feedback on your WAD, and suggestions on how to make it better, you're in the right place.
You mean Minty fresh?Fish hook said:Ooheck! Thanks there Segmint...
<_<
>_>
*takes a sniff at Segmint*
Oooohnow thats the stuff...miny fresh!
Actually, his name's just plain old Mint now.Fish hook said:Ooheck! Thanks there Segmint...
<_<
>_>
*takes a sniff at Segmint*
Oooohnow thats the stuff...miny fresh!
It is?...Kaysakado said:Actually, his name's just plain old Mint now.Fish hook said:Ooheck! Thanks there Segmint...
<_<
>_>
*takes a sniff at Segmint*
Oooohnow thats the stuff...miny fresh!
@Mint: do I get a cookie for using your name right?
Well, just dont ask me to soc it. I sux0rz at soccing.Dude_ said:Actually, I'm going to ask SML89 to see if we can make this more than a port, sorta a bit from the original plus new stuff. It will have all the original characters from DK64, but Sonic, Tails, and Knuckles are playable too. Besides them, we're also adding Dixie Kong and Kiddy Kong from DKC3. (Hopefully, if we get around to them....)
Now if only we could soc the tag barrel...
Think of it, when Frantic Factory had that big motorized machine...