XsoniccoreX (814) said:http://www.venganza.org/about/the-cause/
Basically it is a religion to protest religion itself. It's brilliant.
XsoniccoreX (814) said:Sorry I'm just making an assumption on that. Face it, there were never any WMDs, not that Iraq made anyway, if it was some kind of "war on terror/9-11 revenge plot" Afghanistan would have been the target, not Iraq, and please, Operation Iraqi Liberation? Lol is all I have to say to that. Liberating life from bodies. There are plenty of other countries ruled by dictators and non-democratic politicians that we could have "liberated" so that is a lie. Every war comes down to a simple struggle for power or property/wealth. What's our struggle there when every excuse provided by the military is bull? Pfft, it's a war for wealth, and what does the US have to gain from it? Hmmm, the fact that Iraq holds the 2nd greatest Oil reserve in the world couldn't possibly mean anything, nor the fact that the US needs oil and the Center for Global Energy Studies and Petrolog & Associates estimates that Iraq holds up to 300 Billion Barrels in reserves or Cheney's ties with Halliburton...Dark Warrior said:I'd love some real evidence that supports the "We're in the war for oil" theory.
None of that could mean anything could it? Maybe I'm just stupid. :P
Want evidence? http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/iraq.asp
Want more? Google it yourself and see what you find.
The same Hillary that used her husband's presidency to push her own agenda. All your arguments are for Bill. Not Hillary. And in politics, a husband-wife relationship between two politicians means nothing. I'd beware of that thought process there. Hillary and Bill are two different people. I have no trouble believing that Hillary would dump any support for her husband if it meant her getting into power. Something that must be avoided.XsoniccoreX (814) said:And what about Hilary? Her husband was probably one of the most successful presidents in history. Who cares about Monica Lewinsky? He stabilized our economy and had plans to eliminate our debt by '09 plus he actually cared about the environment and supported the Kyoto Accord. I would think some of that would rub off? Bush > Hilary? I'm sorry but IMO that statement is fail, then again not everyone agrees on everything in politics. Except in communism. Think what you will but I feel she'd do a FAR better job than Bush.
And that's exactly what I'm afraid will happen, should Hillary become president.then again not everyone agrees on everything in politics. Except in communism.
Yea on page 5 all I see is paragraphs @_@.Earuto said:Really, what kind of nnonsense are yall talking about.
Is thier realy a area 5.1 because if thier is shouldent they keep thier own area a secret? Shot* by the F.B.I*mikesword221 said:Area 5.1.They have to many secrets.