SRB2 breaks GPL (TWICE!)

[srb21103]

SRB2 has broken the GNU GPL license not once, but twice. SA-SRB2 included a dll file, actually an exe that ran when you used the launcher.
SRB2 1.10.x (#srb2fun match beta) didn't include the source either.

 

[Boinciel]

SA-SRB2 is not official.
SRB2 1.10.x is not an actual release, and wasn't meant to be spread beyond #srb2fun.

 

[Srb2kirbyo]

SRB2 has broken the GNU GPL license not once, but twice. SA-SRB2 included a dll file, actually an exe that ran when you used the launcher.
SRB2 1.10.x (#srb2fun match beta) didn't include the source either.

1. Not STJr fault.
2. That was never publicly release.

Correct me, If I am wrong please.(I need knowledge.D:)
Ninja'd

 

[Conic]

The SRB2 download doesn't even include the GPL.

 

[srb21103]

1.1 was leaked.

Even though it was leaked, it is no reason not to include the source. Someone who is not a developer and recieved it properly, could you please post here!

 

[glaber]

This validates my calling 1.1 "the leak".

 

[Mystic]

SA-SRB2 wasn't an EXE modification, I don't know what you're talking about.

1.1 beta was not a public release. See this topic here: http://www.srb2.org/mb/viewtopic.php?t=12546

 

[SSNTails]

Not to mention, with 2.0 out, I'm not sure WHY you'd want the code to the match beta anyway... it's got some serious bugs in it and isn't something you'd want to use.