Dark Warrior said:Mac should be illegal anyways.
GCFreak said:Segmint said:Both.
Run Windows, Linux and a lot more Systems on your Mac. Q is a feature packed cocoa port of QEMU: Switch fast between guest PCs. Save and restart guest PCs at any stage. Easily exchange Files between Host and Guest. Q makes use of OS X most advanced technologies like openGL, quartz and coreaudio to accelerate your experience with your guest PC. Please remember: At the present state, QEMU is still considered ALPHA software.
Chao Freak 1 said:You should switch!
Chao Freak 1 said:Only problem is that they can't run .exe files.
FoxBlitzz said:Chao Freak 1 said:You should switch!Chao Freak 1 said:Only problem is that they can't run .exe files.
Those two statements cannot coexist peacefully in your argument.
Besides, the only people that I see gung-ho about switching to Mac are those that were brainwashed by Apple Computer's sugar-coated lies. Okay, maybe that's not entirely true, but I don't get why anyone would want to sacrifice program compatibility just to switch operating systems. I mean, the reason you have an operating system is to organize your files and launch programs, right?
You can get a whole lot more power for a whole lot less money by buying/building a PC. As far as resource hungry, Vista only requires a gig of RAM and a video card made within the past 5 years. It's really not that much to ask.DashFox2007 said:But what about pure power? For those of you who upgraded from Xp to Vista, I'm sure you had to upgrade your hardware and most of you probably say that Macs are weak and lacking in power, but Macs don't need as much power because they take up far less resources than resource hungry Vista.