zeldagamer00 said:
Decent? The Master Server is full of only co-op servers right now, go take a look.
Ontopic, I would like to see something like this happen, though I have a question. Would I still have to forward my ports to host?
A proposition for SRB2 server lovers... (Project Blue Hog)
- Thread starter Cue
- Start date
- Status
Decent? The Master Server is full of only co-op servers right now, go take a look.
Ontopic, I would like to see something like this happen, though I have a question. Would I still have to forward my ports to host?
Cue
ALAM STOP BREAKING THE S
Chrome the hedgehog said:
Why would you? The whole point is that the server is remotely hosted 24/7 on a much faster connection.
The VPS rules will be the same as the MS they connect to, plus a few other rules to keep the usage down.
zeldagamer00, where have you been? Most FPS games have these sorts of things going, why does it kill the point of the master server, eh? It still has a purpose... >_>
On the subject of money, would you guys rather I gave out the service for free, resulting in a lack of money to pay for the servers, thus not making them 24/7 as they go down every month for weeks until I have the money to pay for another month?
SSNTails
What part of 'RETIRED' don't you understand?
Live stats from MySQL? Lulz, how many UPDATE statements are you gonna fire per second?
...Except the game always runs at 100% CPU utilization?
I also don't recommend using 1.09.4 - it's going to crash too often to leave it unmanned for long periods.
Cue said:
...Except the game always runs at 100% CPU utilization?
I also don't recommend using 1.09.4 - it's going to crash too often to leave it unmanned for long periods.
Cue, I know you're netgame hungry, but why don't you just grab a few friends on IRC? I mean, come on. This doesn't feel like it will be helping netgame quality at all.
I like Draykon's idea better, btw. SRB2 MMO sound like it'll be fun if we can get some quality levels. Not that it's going to happen ever.
I like Draykon's idea better, btw. SRB2 MMO sound like it'll be fun if we can get some quality levels. Not that it's going to happen ever.
Cue
ALAM STOP BREAKING THE S
BlueZero4 said:
As much as I love the sound of Draykon's idea, getting enough players for an MMO on even a super computer (luls) is more or less impossible. :<
Never mind multiple maps, just make lots places and link them togethe-... damn, there's the limit. :/
AJ, is there any way at all to increase that limit by even more than 1.1 has? Thinking it through this is starting to sound like a pretty damn good idea.
SSNTails
What part of 'RETIRED' don't you understand?
"65536 ought to be enough for anybody."
Really, you can cram craploads of maps inside that. The entire game engine is based around 16-bit fixed point math, using the top 16-bits for the number, and the bottom 16-bits for the decimal values for a total of 32-bits. If you wanted to go higher, some kind of 64-bit SRB2 would have to be made.
Really, you can cram craploads of maps inside that. The entire game engine is based around 16-bit fixed point math, using the top 16-bits for the number, and the bottom 16-bits for the decimal values for a total of 32-bits. If you wanted to go higher, some kind of 64-bit SRB2 would have to be made.
GemEarthBrandon
Member
SSNTails said:
I can use bigger then 65536 becuase everytime I think my level is big enough, my level still ends up looking small.
Rekk
Member
...You can't use more than 65536. That's the limit for 1.1. The limit for 1.09.4 is even smaller, being 32768. And if you made a map bigger than 65536, it would be... ridiculously enormous. No level really needs to be that size, unless you want the map to take hours to complete (that is, if it isn't just a straight path from one side of the map to the other). Of course, you would be intersecting the blockmap, so I guess that's not possible anyway.
- Status