What are your favorite comic strips?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wombatwarlord777

"...What?"
This is totally copied and pasted from the DeviantArt forums, but I want to hear what you guys think and don't want to retype this ridiculously long post.

Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis (http://comics.com/pearls_before_swine) is probably my favorite comic strip still in circulation today. It's topical, edgy and probably the closest equivalent to South Park the funny pages will ever see. And while the humor is usually dark and all the characters are flawed, the cast is also readily relatable. In that sense, Pastis has achieved a great balance.

On the other hand, Mutts by Patrick McDonnell (http://muttscomics.com/) is perhaps the most artistically rich comic still running today. McDonnell has a great, loose style and his Sunday recreations of famous art pieces are always a joy. The overt environmentalism is a bit grating in my opinion, and the jokes aren't always cerebrally satisfying, but the overal nature of Mutts is much more playful than it is intelligent. It's a delightful comic overall.

Cul de Sac by Richard Thompson (http://www.gocomics.com/culdesac/) is interesting. When the strip first starting appearing in our area's paper, I disliked it, thinking that the writing and artwork were lazy. Since then, Cul de Sac has really grown on me. The writing is doesn't follow the conventional standards of building up a punch line, and feels more like a natural if mapcap conversation between the characters, making the comic feel satisfying throughout. And the sketchy, childlike artwork fits the tone of the strip near perfectly. I guess I should also mention that Thompson is a great watercolor painter, and employs that skills into his comic in the first Cul de Sac book.

Other comics I like include:

Liberty Meadows, by Frank Cho (http://www.libertymeadows.com/uncens.htm) (this guy has his anatomy down. His women are especially impressive)

Non Sequitur, by Wiley (http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/) (Wiley is a great political/social humorist and his storylines and charactizations are so removed from what you expect)

Lio, by Mark Tatulli (http://www.gocomics.com/lio/) (gets points for its great visual gags, almost entirely without written dialogue)

Dilbert, by Scott Adams (http://www.dilbert.com/) (Adams has a great understanding of the darker and more absurd side of human existance)

The Boondocks, by Aaron McGruder (http://www.gocomics.com/boondocks/2009/10/11/) (McGruder filled the comic niche of black social / political interests superbly. I had my doubts that the comic would have enough source material to last for more than a few years, but in retrospect that's shortsighted)

Calvin and Hobbes, by Bill Waterson (http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/) (THE best comic strip ever. Enough said)

Bloom Country (and, what the hell, Outland and Opus), by Berkeley Breathed (http://www.berkeleybreathed.com/pages/favorite_strips.asp) (The dialogue in this comic usually feels like a train wreck, but in a good way)

Peanuts, by Charles Schultz (http://comics.com/peanuts) (it's really, really hard not to like Peanuts)

Life in Hell, by Matt Groening (http://profron.net/fun/LifeInHell_Prozak.gif) (Groening is such a wonderful wordsmith)

Well, that's it. So, what are your favorite comic strips, and why? Feel free to include either newspaper or web-comics. My apologies if there's a recent topic like this.
 
Foxtrot, probably.
It has funny cultural references, but unlike most types of media, it doesn't solely rely on them. It has it's own original humor, and it has funny characters, despite them being stereotypical.
 
Pearls before Swine, Dilbert, Garfield, Calvin and Hobbes, Non Sequitur, and one I forget the name of.
 
Calvin, when it was new and Bloom County then too.

I still read Garfield (it's getting good again), Peanuts, Beetle Bailey and Hagar.
 
I used to a Garfield fanatic when I was a kid. I collected all the books and more than enough memorabilia. In retrospect, it was kind of embarrassing.

I thought the decision to make Liz John's permanent girlfriend was an obvious grasp for readership. Is that impression correct?
 
Not really. Aside from the insertion of Marcy, Peppermint Pattry and Franklin in the 1960's, Peanuts was almost exactly the same for 50 years. Hell, Charlie Brown didn't win a baseball game until the 90's. And yet, Peanuts was still a great cartoon all in all.

I think the problem with Garfield is that the focus of the strip is shallow and narrow. I'll admit, there's only so many jokes you can do with a cat whose entire mindset is "eat and sleep". But the worst part is that those jokes appeal only at the most unsophisticated level. That's why Garfield, in my opinion, isn't a very satisfying comic strip.
 
Last edited:
Eh, I'm just going by my personal experience. Peanuts is certainly one of the better strips because its focus is a little larger.

My favorite comic strip? Dilbert. That comic never gets old because there is always something going on at the corporate level (or around there) that isn't just a little fishy or just plain wrong.
 
xkcd.

If you don't like it, you're either boring, you don't understand it, or you have no taste. :<
 
PBS rocks.

strip65.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who is viewing this thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Back
Top