Member Purge
- Thread starter Mystic
- Start date
- Status
Super mystic sonic
The Golden Blur
No, the bump actually had some use. With all these 0 post acounts we have these days, a new purge would be really good.
Black Zero
Member
I was talking about the useless TOPICS or threads whatever you call them, I hope you knew that. It IS possible for the mods to delete threads completely as opposed to just locking them...right?
They're not deleted for a reason. It's the members that need purging.
Yes, but sometimes even locked topics serve a purpose after being locked. Many of them just for a good laugh, but some actually have good references later on. I've used locked topics to convey purposes in the past. I don't doubt that people will use them to do the same later, too. There's no point to deleting them.
And any topic locked because someone was breaking a rule serves as a point to everyone else what NOT to do.
Anyways, member stats:
So far we have 1086 members with AT LEAST one post.
We have 505 members with 10 or more posts.
And we have 296 members with over 30 posts.
In total we have 2117 members.
Sad.
Anyways, member stats:
So far we have 1086 members with AT LEAST one post.
We have 505 members with 10 or more posts.
And we have 296 members with over 30 posts.
In total we have 2117 members.
Sad.
The Yellow Blue Dude
Member
JJames19119 said:
1031 with no posts, I agree, Sad.
[deleted user]
Member
Only 296 with over 30 posts, whao, this is really sad, but how could any of us help to stop it?JJames19119 said:
The Yellow Blue Dude
Member
camo man said:
I don't know.
Black Zero
Member
Um... How about posting more? *shot*
The Yellow Blue Dude
Member
Black Zero said:
I thought my answer was pretty good.
[deleted user]
Member
Unfortunatly, I think you are right and that we may be doomed to hundreds of more perge users in the new year.Dark Warrior said:
The Yellow Blue Dude
Member
camo man said:
Well there is that one possibility unfortunatly I didn't (like i always don't ) understand the question.
The Yellow Blue Dude
Member
tails92 said:
Again? I mst be pretty new I don't remember any before.
Why do you people not understand that bumping is not against the rules...Bouncey said:
No, seriously. It doesn't say anywhere in the rules that you can't do it. Lay off, man. <_<
Gack... I can understand how tedious that can be, though to a smaller scale. On my forum, the visual confirmation thing, uh... disabled itself somehow, allowing bots to get, and as time built up, I had about seventy accounts of them. <_<;;Mystic said:
When I'd have time, I could delete about 200 accounts just to give a helping hand... but that can only be done by admins, so meh. XP
- Status