Old Rules Topic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shuffle, Any particular reason you named the sonic avatar what you named it?

luis said:
Tell us now if it's not a possibility
Click to expand...

The reason I said that is because I don not desire to compress images if the file size limit will rise.
 
Kaysakado, that its the dumbest idea I have ever seen, but it may be the only choice if this place becomes overpopulated with noobs.
 
Re: Rules

Mystic said:
1. Generally speaking, keep the board to the content that can be broadcast on network TV (Think "The Simpsons") and use your own common sense as to what's allowed or not allowed on the board. For those of you who seem to be incapable of figuring this out, the following is forbidden:
  • Sexual content, including pornography
  • Excessive cursing
  • Illegal material (Warez, free MP3s, ROMs, etc.)
Click to expand...

The word "asshole" should be censored "ass****", just because the word is not allowed to be said on most public/cable/network/whatever TV.
 
I dunno. I suppose either way would work, but I think it'd be better to use the part of the word that gets censored the most often. Because I don't watch TV very often, I wouldn't know.
 
Re: Rules

Segmint said:
The word "asshole" should be censored "ass****", just because the word is not allowed to be said on most public/cable/network/whatever TV.
Click to expand...
Yeah, sorry bout that, that was my bad :( it won't happen again.
 
Dreamcaster said:
on Edge said:
What? Why not ***hole?
Click to expand...

Why not n00bs get a brain and just not say it?
Click to expand...
I dunno, because I guess people want to say how they really feel so they use cursing to vent out their frustrations in a confrontation I suppose..who knows? lol
 
Heh, and most of the time the N00bs cant even spell the curses right anyway, and then they curse at you more when you laugh. :lol: BTW, how many N00bs have already had to be dealt with that rules are more strict than just a week ago?
 
I wasn't sure where I should ask this, but anyways, I know we're not allowed to have images in our sigs, but not even little ones, like:
favicon.JPG
 
phpBB2 does not support a way to limit the amount of images and the size of them in a sig. There might be a MOD to fix that, But I know it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Sonict
 
No, I mean, we'd get our sig changed if we broke the "No images in sigs" rule, but would small images still count for that rule?
 
Images were disabled for a reason because of what I said. Since there is no way to moderate the pictures in a sig without a forum MOD and having to check _everybody's_ sig to make sure it is ok, they are disabled for that very reason and they are not coming back.

Sonict
 
Yup. I'm actually surprised how you didn't disable signatures. You may want also limit the number of lines for them, because with 255 characters you can put 255 new-lines and hence have 255 lines and stretch the tables anyways :P In fact, some forums even don't allow avatars :/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who is viewing this thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Back
Top