Yoshi
Randomly found avatar
Yes. They still say Nintendo's was worse.
Yes because 23 games like AC3, New Super Mario Bros or Zombie U are worse than Microsoft's hour of BETTER ONLINE.
Yes. They still say Nintendo's was worse.
At this point I've pretty much just elected to wait and see if Nintendo has some actually gripping content to show off in the future, either at a later game show, or of their own announcement or probably even just at the next E3. There's nothing at E3 2012 that was deserving of shelling out a few hundred dollars for an entirely new console when there's no content on that console that's new and/or interesting. Who needs Mass Effect 3 and Arkham City for the Wii U when everyone can already play it (and most have beaten it) for other systems? Who cares about Assassin's Creed 3 on Wii U when you can but it for a (non-Nintendo) console you might already own?
I guess they have ME3 and Assassin's Creed just to show that their console will have hardcore stuff as well.
Also http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/06/05/e3-2012-nintendo-announces-project-p-100-for-wii-u
May be good, wonder why they haven't said anything before.