Jellybones
Lawful Neutral
Autosaver said:
No, they do not. The N64, DS, NES, SNES, etc, don't look that great and they still have good games, a lot which are still played today.
Nintendo Wii. Your opinions
- Thread starter super
- Start date
- Status
No, they do not. The N64, DS, NES, SNES, etc, don't look that great and they still have good games, a lot which are still played today.
LongcrierCat
Down In It
I really wish that the third parties would take the Wii seriously and actually try to make a game.... Instead, whenever it comes to anyone who isn't SEGA and Ubisoft, they try to imitate real life. Is that what I came to play? Reality in game format? I want a platformer/action experience dagnabbit. Not some shovelware to get kids that are barely 5 going, "Oh yes! This is going to be so cool!"
Besides... The new generation doesn't like kiddy stuff anymore. Most cartoons like Flapjack are considered "gay" now... What? A little kid would actually be allowed to play a Teen game or even M considering how careless the parents are?
But still, points to consider.... We're a lot smarter than the entertainment industry thinks we are. We want something fun and thoughtful. Wii was at first an ingenious idea until the Third parties looked at it as if it were a toilet just waiting for crap upon steaming pile of crap. Sure, it could be Nintendo's fault, but when a well known company who makes excellent games most of the time for hardcore gamers then makes kiddified shovelware for Wii and passes it off as a game, don't you think something's wrong there?
And here come the rumors for the new SEGA system... Well... All I can say is at least SEGA will be smart and push out as much potential as possible... After all, SA2 was clearly the most advanced graphical game of its time. No other game looked better than it. Even Resident Evil would be shamed in SA2's graphical powerhoused exterior. And then there was the suspenseful gameplay that got you interested.
Whatever happened to good Nintendo Third Party Games? Do they just not care anymore? Can anyone tell me what is wrong?
Besides... The new generation doesn't like kiddy stuff anymore. Most cartoons like Flapjack are considered "gay" now... What? A little kid would actually be allowed to play a Teen game or even M considering how careless the parents are?
But still, points to consider.... We're a lot smarter than the entertainment industry thinks we are. We want something fun and thoughtful. Wii was at first an ingenious idea until the Third parties looked at it as if it were a toilet just waiting for crap upon steaming pile of crap. Sure, it could be Nintendo's fault, but when a well known company who makes excellent games most of the time for hardcore gamers then makes kiddified shovelware for Wii and passes it off as a game, don't you think something's wrong there?
And here come the rumors for the new SEGA system... Well... All I can say is at least SEGA will be smart and push out as much potential as possible... After all, SA2 was clearly the most advanced graphical game of its time. No other game looked better than it. Even Resident Evil would be shamed in SA2's graphical powerhoused exterior. And then there was the suspenseful gameplay that got you interested.
Whatever happened to good Nintendo Third Party Games? Do they just not care anymore? Can anyone tell me what is wrong?
Blitzzo
It's Mr. Computer!
You're referring to the 2006-and-onward Petz games. The original series, released in the mid 90's, was for the PC, and was developed by P.F.Magic. The newer (and crappier) games were developed by several different companies - Digital Kids, Magic Pockets, HI Corporation... just because something bears the name Ubisoft, doesn't mean they made it. They only published the game. People get this mixed up all the time.
LongcrierCat
Down In It
Please exclude the Petz game when reasoning about Ubisoft. You have to take in consideration of Ubisoft's talent when it comes to Beyond Good and Evil and the Rayman series (yes, even the Raving Rabbids games.)FoxBlitzz said:
LongcrierCat
Down In It
Either way I meant, Ubisoft is a largely respected company all in all. And for good reasons.Autosaver said:
LongcrierCat
Down In It
Alright then, I made a mistake, we realize it. End of that matter.FoxBlitzz said:
I've only really seen the SIXAXIS controller used for tilting and shaking, which makes it FAR different from a Wii Remote.
Also, Callum, the Wii has 4 MHz LESS processing power than the Xbox.
Autosaver
Member
:SonicMaster: said:
In the end it evens it out.
People try to trick you with "Arcade $50 less then the Wii!"
But when you turn it on,it uses 4X as much power/electricity making it more expensive off the bat.
Now why I quoted you,"Tilting and shaking" Isn't that what the Wii remote does? O_O
Also the feature is barely used either.
Jurai_Madman
Ich bin der Verrucktmann
The Wiimote waggles. Thank you.
:SonicMaster: said:
*sigh* Do I HAVE to do this again?
CLOCK SPEED DOES NOT MAKE A PROCESSOR FAST. How could the Athlon XP be clocked less than the older Pentium 4s yet be so much faster? Same situtation with Intel's own Core 2 line against the Pentium 4/Pentium D. Also, the PowerPC architecture is IMO MUCH, MUCH more efficient than the x86 architecture, especially when we're talking about a specialised IBM Broadway processor vs an ancient, horrible, underpowered, general purpose Intel Celeron processor.
All I remember you saying is that processor speed isn't everything. I took it to mean that RAM, GPU, and amount of cores were taken into account. Not this.
- Status