:SonicMaster: said:
Yeah, and the 7.00 score you got clearly shows that you can make much better levels than what are in Sonic 06.
I consider 7.00 as "playable and enjoyable map". i.e., a map that accomplishes its function as a place for a game to take place and is worthy to be played again. Then, you map is approved. In my opinion, 7 is the lowest score that a decent map must receive. 5 is just a map that worked.
I have the following method to review maps:
10 - perfection
09 - impressive map
08 - playable and enjoyable map with impressive parts
07 - playable and enjoyable map (what a game needs)
06 - playable map with enjoyable parts
05 - playable map (just worked as map)
04 - some minor flaws in critical points (gameplay flow, movement flow, technical flaws, consistency behavior, scenery/identity, path clarity etc)
03 - failed in some critical points (needs important corrections)
02 - failed in half of critical points
01 - failed in most critical points
00 - failed in all critical points or just doesn't work