Actually, I think most people just copied Mystic's list. I know I always do that.And by the way, guys, you might want to check your spelling. It seems like almost everyone except me is calling Miles Knuckles Power "Miles Knuckle Prower" - even, rather shockingly, Mystic himself, in the list of entries. I seem to recall asking him once in a Private Message whether he misspelled his name when creating his account, and he told me that he really did call himself "Miles Knuckle Power" deliberately. So, yeah, you might want to actually check the name of the author next time.
Lakeside Hill Zone ----------------- 2 3 3 414 2 1 1 1 2 - 1 1 2 2 2 --- 2.066666667
Mossy Mushroom Zone ------------- 744 6 - 6 8 8 4 6 8 --- 6.333333333
Egg Hanger Zone ------------------ 9 945 8 9 - 6 8 7 6 4 --- 6.5
We already round for two digits after the decimal point.Ah, in fact ... Lakeside Hill and Mossy Mushroom, let's just round up to 2 and 6.3 respectively ...
People can give any vote that they want if they feel that it deserves such a score. If someone thinks Angle Forest deserves a 0, then they are allowed to give it a 0.I was just thinking, I know Angle Forest got a 0 from someone. Should that even be allowed? I mean, people are allowed their opinions and all, but 0 is meant for unplayable maps, not bad maps. It certainly wasn't unplayable at all. Just because someone stinks so bad they can't get over a spring pit doesn't mean they can rate the thing a 0, does it? I could even understand, if it lagged like Cherry Canyon did in the one contest, but it doesn't, no, not at all.
Isn't that a bit unfair? Like Chary said, I think 0's should be reserved for unplayable maps only.(Like the OP scale) The map was not unplayable and it was just someone not being able to pass an obstacle.People can give any vote that they want if they feel that it deserves such a score. If someone thinks Angle Forest deserves a 0, then they are allowed to give it a 0.
It's playable IMO, but my point was is that 0 isn't exclusively reserved for unplayable maps. After all, EVERY map could be construed as unplayable if the person is bad enough at the game.Isn't that a bit unfair? Like Chary said, I think 0's should be reserved for unplayable maps only.(Like the OP scale) The map was not unplayable and it was just someone not being able to pass an obstacle.
Edit: This post is going off Chary's post that the map is playable, if this map is really unplayable then ignore this post.
I think that Angle Forest could be reasonably construed as unplayable. It's nearly impossible to get the flag, particularly in a large netgame.
Define "unplayable". That term will have different meanings to different people.
Impossible to complete.